http://www.antheaappel.com/blog/archives/1171 Just another WordPress weblog Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:57:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://www.antheaappel.com/blog/archives/1171/comment-page-1#comment-421 Anthea Mon, 17 May 2010 17:53:17 +0000 http://antheaappel.com/blog/?p=1171#comment-421 Yes, the Tamrin mummies are older than the European "Celts". The La Tene period---which is attributed to the Celts and were the ruling power of a barbarian Europe---developed from 450 BC to the Roman conquest 1st century BCE. But it doesn't mean the La Tene civilization and the Celts were one and the same. The La Tene period corresponds to only one of several groups of the Celts (the Celts had split-up long before the 5th century BC), who were called the Brythons. And they weren't the same Celts who settled in Ireland. Yes, the Tamrin mummies are older than the European “Celts”. The La Tene period—which is attributed to the Celts and were the ruling power of a barbarian Europe—developed from 450 BC to the Roman conquest 1st century BCE. But it doesn’t mean the La Tene civilization and the Celts were one and the same. The La Tene period corresponds to only one of several groups of the Celts (the Celts had split-up long before the 5th century BC), who were called the Brythons. And they weren’t the same Celts who settled in Ireland.

]]> http://www.antheaappel.com/blog/archives/1171/comment-page-1#comment-420 Ann Mon, 17 May 2010 16:25:12 +0000 http://antheaappel.com/blog/?p=1171#comment-420 They can be proto-celtic at most, as the Tamrin mummies are older than the 'Celts' in Europe? ;) They can be proto-celtic at most, as the Tamrin mummies are older than the ‘Celts’ in Europe?

]]>